1. Amber Rudd: Climate Thatcherite promises green business boost

    May 11, 2015

    11 May 2015, by James Murray  , BusinessGreen

    Amber Rudd

    The sigh of relief from across the green business community was almost audible. With the bizarre and ultimately doomed appointment of climate sceptic Owen Paterson as Environment Secretary casting a long-shadow there was genuine concern David Cameron could use his unexpected majority to push action on climate change down the agenda with the appointment of a Secretary of State disinclined to take decarbonisation seriously. It is not as if he didn’t have plenty of ambitious ministers with minimal interest in climate change and hostility towards clean technologies to choose from.

    With one Tweet those fears, not to mention concerns the whole Department of Energy and Climate Change could be for the chop, were quelled. The appointment of Amber Rudd as the Energy and Climate Change Secretary is not simply just reward for an able and collegiate politician who has just increased her majority in a marginal seat, it is also great news for the green economy.

    Rudd has repeatedly put herself on record as warning that it is vital to take action on climate change, because of the “devastating impact it could have nationally and internationally” – a braver and more principled position than it should be for an ambitious Conservative politician given the manner in which this analysis is loudly rejected by some of her own colleagues.

    More importantly, she has a coherent sense of how environmental protection and climate action fits into modern Conservatism having previously identified herself as a “Thatcherite when it comes to climate change“, fond of quoting the Iron Lady’s famous assertion that “The core of Tory philosophy and for the case for protecting the environment are the same: No generation has a freehold on this earth. All we have is a life tenancy-with a full repairing lease”.

    As a former banker, city headhunter, and financial journalist she also understands instinctively that it is business and innovation that represents the last best hope of delivering steep cuts in global carbon emissions.

    Perhaps most importantly for green businesses, energy utilities and investors, Rudd has experience at DECC and a mandate to broadly continue with the current low carbon policy regime.

    Both the FT and Telegraph have already run articles arguing current policies are failing and calling for a fundamental overhaul of UK energy policy that dilutes the current focus on decarbonisation. Climate sceptic backbenchers will lap up this analysis and use it to demand a wider re-think. However, Tory sources this morning indicated the green economy should not worry too much about this analysis given the leadership’s commitment to long term emissions reductions remains solid. Rudd’s appointment underlines that commitment and means Cameron has passed the first test of whether he will stand by his pre-election commitment to continue to drive the decarbonisation of the British economy. Significant changes to the previous government’s electricity market reform programme and energy efficiency strategy would now come as a major surprise.

    It is important to remember Rudd’s appointment is anything but a sinecure and her commitment to tackling climate change is no guarantee this government will do so effectively. She faces numerous daunting challenges, several of which are made harder by a manifesto that lacked sufficient ambition on environmental issues and paints the Conservatives into a contradictory corner where they hymn the virtues of low cost decarbonisation while blocking low cost onshore wind farms and offering little in the way of new thinking on low cost energy efficiency measures.

    The Paris Summit is just the most high profile of a series of early tests, which also include the finalisation of long-running nuclear negotiations with EDF, the need to jump start the UK’s carbon capture programme, and imminent spending cuts at DECC. Crucial negotiations with the Treasury and Number 10 on the next wave of emissions targets and clean energy funding also present a major challenge. Rudd’s previous role as Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Chancellor may result in more collegiate relations with the Treasury than DECC has experienced over the past five years, although it may also fuel fears the Treasury brake on green economic progress will become even more pronounced.

    All these challenges will need to be overcome while coping with the impact an EU referendum will have on investor confidence and battling with a constant drumbeat of opposition to green policies from parts of the press and some of Rudd’s own colleagues.

    However, these valid concerns are for another day. For now green business leaders will welcome the fact that the new Secretary of State is as committed to tackling the threat presented by climate change as they are. Just as they will welcome the fact the Prime Minister wants an Energy and Climate Change Secretary who takes both topics seriously. The green business community and the Conservative leadership won’t always agree on how best to slash emissions, bolster UK climate security and enhance clean tech competitiveness, but Rudd’s appointment makes it clear the goal remains a shared one.

    Update:

    Those sighs of relief across the green economy have just turned to cheers with the news Eric Pickles has been replaced as Communities Secretary by Greg Clark, bringing an end to a period in which Pickles sought to undermine pretty much every environmental policy he had a hand in. In contrast, Clark has won plenty of plaudits from green groups in the past and is well regarded for his rational, evidence-based approach to policy-making. Add in confirmation Liz Truss is continuing at Defra and the climate sceptic wing of the party has been well and truly locked out of the main environmental briefs.

    As former Climate Change Minister Greg Barker wrote on Twitter this afternoon it is “shaping up to be a v progressive, pro green agenda reshuffle”.

    For those green business still smarting at the imminent halt to the UK’s onshore wind farm industry and the Tory manifesto’s limited ambition on energy efficiency the fact these policies will be enacted by Ministers who understand the urgency of the climate crisis may prove cold comfort. But there is little doubt Cameron has today exceeded the green communities’ expectations with a reshuffle that puts the Party’s modernisers in charge of the UK’s environmental policy framework.


  2. Problems mount as more homes without new-build EPCs come on the market

    May 7, 2015

    Written by: Rosalind Renshaw | May 7, 2015

    Are agents having trouble getting hold of EPCs for houses that were new-builds circa 2008 and are now being put up for sale?

    The EPC requirements for new homes are more onerous than for existing homes, requiring SAP calculations. However, it appears that several homes built or converted after April 2008 never had EPCs in the first place, posing problems for agents.

    The issue also highlights a more unlikely problem under the legislation as to what is a new home.

    Lee Russell, of Davis Tate in Woodley, Berkshire, says he has been tearing his hair out and approached Eye to highlight the matter.

    He has been receiving ongoing instructions on several homes without EPCs and has received conflicting advice.

    He turned to the Landmark EPC helpdesk after his EPC assessor said that the law requires all homes built from April 2008 to have a SAP EPC.

    The assessor’s advice was: “If this wasn’t done at the time of completion the legal requirement to produce a SAP EPC is not lifted and therefore must still be produced as the first EPC.”

    Landmark initially advised: “We must emphasise that we cannot provide advice on when a new building is no longer a new building. It is not something that is defined in Regulations. The Regulations do specify, however, that EPCs are required when a building is constructed, sold or let.

    “The requirements for newly constructed buildings to have an EPC on completion came into force on 6 April 2008; therefore, in the circumstances described, an EPC should have been provided for the properties.

    “If no EPC currently exists for the properties then one must now be provided if there is an intention to re-sell the properties.

    “It is unlikely that the detailed plans and specifications, that would have been available at the time of construction, are easily accessible now. It is also debatable whether properties which have been occupied for more than seven years (or constructed seven years ago) could be classified as a new dwelling.

    “In these circumstances the most sensible approach would be for the EPCs to be produced using RdSAP software.”

    The energy assessor then contacted the Quidos helpdesk, saying: “Properties built in 2008, 2009 and 2010 are now frequently going on the market and many did not have a Full SAP EPC carried out at the time of original completion/sale/let. As such agents are now approaching me to carry out an EPC to meet their legal obligation.

    “My stance has been what I was advised many years ago by BRE, namely that a full SAP EPC is still required as per regulations as these properties are ‘new builds’ regardless of whether they have been lived in or already sold before.

    “The fact that a full SAP EPC was not carried out does not remove the requirement to still have that done as the first EPC. Is this correct?”

    Quidos replied saying that this was correct.

    Landmark then said that their original response was incorrect. A full SAP EPC has to be carried out on all properties completed after April 6, 2008.

    Landmark’s new advice said: “We suggest that you follow the advice provided to you via your assessor from the accreditation schemes. This would be to first establish that there is no existing EPC by contacting the original builders/sellers and building control before commissioning your assessor to carry out an RdSAP report.

    “Otherwise you will have to commission a new SAP EPC for each property.”

    Davis Tate’s Lee Russell tells Eye that the developers of those original “new” homes now coming up for resale include well-known names. It is a mystery as to why these developers did not follow the letter of the law when it came to EPCs.

    But shouldn’t it be up to the vendors to provide the EPCs that they weren’t given in the first place?

    Russell said: “If you talk to sellers about EPCs, they look at you as though you have got two heads.

    “But in any case, I simply haven’t the time to chase up the original developers.

    “This problem is only going to get worse, as more and more of these properties come on to the market.”

    Eye would be interested to hear from other agents who find that homes built a few years ago have no EPCs. We would also be glad of advice from EPC firms.


  3. Tesla unveils batteries to power homes

    May 1, 2015

    From BBC News

    • 1 May 2015

    US electric carmaker Tesla Motors has unveiled batteries that can power homes and businesses as it attempts to expand beyond its vehicle business.

    Chief executive Elon Musk announced the firm would build batteries that store solar energy and serve as a back-up system for consumers during blackouts.

    The device would allow consumers to get off a power grid or bring energy to remote areas that are not on a grid.

    Tesla plans to start shipping the units to installers in the US by this summer.

    In a highly anticipated event near Los Angeles, Mr Musk said the move could help change the “entire energy infrastructure of the world”.

     

    “Tesla Energy is a critical step in this mission to enable zero emission power generation,” the company said in a statement.

    The rechargeable lithium-ion battery unit would be built using the same batteries Tesla produces for its electric vehicles, analysts said.

    The system is called Powerwall, and Tesla will sell the 7kWh unit for $3,000 (£1,954), while the 10kWh unit will retail for $3,500 (£2,275) to installers.

    Energy comparison firm USwitch estimates that one kWh can power two days of work on a laptop, a full washing machine cycle or be used to boil a kettle 10 times.

    Mr Musk said the company would partner with SolarCity to install the home batteries, but there would be more companies announced.

    Mr Musk is SolarCity’s chairman and largest shareholder.

    line

    Analysis: Richard Taylor, BBC News, San Francisco

    Tesla’s move into so-called “stationary storage” is a market with enormous growth potential: as the world slowly moves away from fossil fuels, it is seen as critical to a more widespread adoption of “clean” energy sources like solar and wind.

    There is also a strong commercial rationale for Elon Musk to leverage Tesla’s expertise in building highly-efficient car batteries and put them in a single unit in consumers’ residences.

    The business strategy is a bit like the battery itself: high impact, but a slow release which will really only reap significant benefits over time. But it comes with risks. Tesla may face a challenge getting the cost-saving message across to potential customers, especially with a significant $3,500 upfront cost.

    The carmaker also faces competition from battery-storage technology rivals with deep pockets such as GE (General Electric) and South Korea’s top chemical company, LG Chem. There is also a danger that this particular lithium ion battery could be superseded within a few years by other technology, like hydrogen fuel cells, which Tesla is not equipped to make.

    Still, these are risks Tesla is clearly prepared to take on. Its cars have won rave reviews, but precious few sales outside its California heartland. With a $5bn gigafactory not due to open until 2017, and only a single Tesla vehicle available to buy today, diversification of its product line into an area like this will be key to keeping investors happy.

    line

    The sales of battery storage systems for homes and businesses could yield as much as $4.5bn in revenue for Tesla, according to Deutsche Bank.

    The automaker reported fourth quarter earnings that missed market expectations in February, as it saw a loss of $107.6m on production and delivery issues.

    Friends of the Earth’s renewable energy campaigner Alasdair Cameron said having solar panels and a home battery in the future could become as common as central heating.

    “Just as the internet changed the way we use information so renewable sources, like wind and solar, are changing the way we make and use energy – and electricity storage is an important part of that change,” he said.

    “Cheaper and more efficient energy storage means individuals and businesses could save renewable energy until they need it, hugely reducing the need for climate-changing fossil fuels.”

    Colin Brown, director of engineering at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers said Tesla’s announcement is timely considering the push by governments to reduce emissions.

    “Without storage you’ve always got to have huge capacity just in case one of the peaks come through at a particular time – a very hot day when you need a lot of cooling, and so a lot of demand. With storage, you don’t have to have all of that massive production of energy,” he said.